文章摘要
韩笑,吕立江,应晓明,等.杠杆定位手法结合施罗斯矫形术治疗特发性脊柱侧弯的临床研究[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2020,44(11):1047-1053.
杠杆定位手法结合施罗斯矫形术治疗特发性脊柱侧弯的临床研究
Clinical Research on Treating Idiopathic Scoliosis by Lever Positioning Manipulation and Schroth Method
DOI:10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2020.11.004
中文关键词: 特发性脊柱侧弯  杠杆定位手法  施罗斯矫形术  Cobb角  顶椎偏距  临床观察
英文关键词: idiopathic scoliosis  lever positioning manipulation  Schroth Method  Cobb angle  apical vertebra translation  clinical observation
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81774442);国家临床重点专科建设项目(国卫医发[2013]42号);浙江省重大疾病中医药防治中心项目(浙中医药[2018]9号);浙江省中医药科技计划项目(浙卫发[2019]52号)
作者单位E-mail
韩笑 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053  
吕立江 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053 731577158@qq.com 
应晓明 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053  
陈家正 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053  
张潮 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053  
朱永涛 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院  杭州  310053  
摘要点击次数: 2119
全文下载次数: 2083
中文摘要:
      [目的]观察研究杠杆定位手法结合施罗斯矫形术对特发性脊柱侧弯(idiopathic scoliosis,IS)患者Cobb角与顶椎偏距(apical vertebra translation,AVT)的影响。[方法]将符合纳入标准与诊断标准的70例IS患者分为杠杆定位手法结合施罗斯矫形术组(观察组)和施罗斯矫形术组(对照组),分别对两组患者的临床疗效、治疗前后Cobb角与AVT的变化进行评估比较。[结果]与治疗前比较,治疗后两组患者Cobb角均减小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组间比较,观察组Cobb角变化优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗后两组患者AVT均减小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组间比较,观察组AVT变化优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组总有效率优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]与施罗斯矫形术相比,杠杆定位手法结合施罗斯矫形术能更有效地治疗IS,使患者Cobb角、AVT明显改善,临床疗效显著。
英文摘要:
      [Objective]To observe the clinical efficacy and the influence on Cobb angle and apical vertebra translation(AVT) of lever positioning manipulation and Schroth Method in treating idiopathic scoliosis(IS). [Methods] Seventy patients with IS who met the criteria for inclusion were randomly divided into group of lever positioning manipulation and Schroth Method(observation group) and Schroth Method group(control group). The clinical efficacy, Cobb angle and AVT of two groups were evaluated and compared. [Results] The Cobb angle of two groups decreased after treatment(P<0.05). After treatment, the Cobb angle of observation group was lower than that of control group, and the difference was statistical(P<0.05). The AVT of two groups decreased after treatment(P<0.05). After treatment, the AVT of the observation group was lower than that of control group, and the difference was statistical(P<0.05).The total effective rate of observation group was significantly better than that of control group, the data of two groups were statistically different(P<0.05). [Conclusion]Compared with Schroth Method, lever positioning manipulation and Schroth Method together can more effectively treat IS, which can improve Cobb angle and AVT significantly, and have significant clinical effect.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭