朱飞叶,谢冠群.徐荣斋重订《通俗伤寒论》的贡献[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2021,45(6):637-640. |
徐荣斋重订《通俗伤寒论》的贡献 |
XU Rongzhai's Contribution to the Revision of “Common Treatise of Febrile Disease” |
DOI:10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2021.06.013 |
中文关键词: 通俗伤寒论 徐荣斋 绍派伤寒 俞根初 八纲辨证 调护 浙派中医 |
英文关键词: Common Treatise of Febrile Disease XU Rongzhai febrile disease of Shaoxing school YU Genchu syndrome differentiation of eight principles conditioning and nursing TCM of Zhejiang school |
基金项目:浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2019ZQ011) |
|
摘要点击次数: 1958 |
全文下载次数: 971 |
中文摘要: |
[目的]总结徐荣斋先生修订《通俗伤寒论》所做的工作以及对绍派伤寒发展所做的贡献。[方法]通过研读《重订通俗伤寒论》,根据其删减、新增的内容,重点从辨证辨病方法、诊法、调护等方面归纳总结绍派伤寒理论的发展。[结果]《通俗伤寒论》作为绍派伤寒的扛鼎之作,自成书以来经过多次修订,尤其是上世纪五十年代,经过徐荣斋先生的整理,《重订通俗伤寒论》才重新得以刊行。徐荣斋先生进一步突出了八纲辨证在绍派伤寒辨证中的基础地位,以八纲解释六经;更加重视辨病与辨证相结合,强调以法统方;丰富了问诊、舌诊、脉诊等伤寒的四诊方法,并以生动案例说明脱证的治疗;增加病中调理法,总结了护理要点。[结论]《重订通俗伤寒论》的出版,使绍派伤寒理论更加完善,内容更加通俗易懂,尤其是诊法、调护等学术思想在外感热病流派中颇具特色,使得绍派伤寒这个具有浙江地方特色的中医学术流派发扬光大。 |
英文摘要: |
[Objective] To summarize XU Rongzhai's work in revising “Common Treatise of Febrile Disease” and his contribution to the development of febrile disease of Shaoxing school. [Methods] Through studying XU Rongzhai's “Revisited Common Treatise of Febrile Disease”,this article elaborated and analyzed its deletions and additions, and summarized the theory development of febrile disease of Shaoxing school focused on the aspects of syndrome differentiation, diagnosis and treatment,etc. [Results]“Common Treatise of Febrile Disease”, as a masterpiece of Febrile Disease of Shaoxing school, has been revised many times since it was written. Especially in the 1950s, after the collation by XU Rongzhai, “Revisited Common Treatise of Febrile Disease” was published again. XU Rongzhai further highlighted the basic status of eight principal syndrome differentiation in febrile disease of Shaoxing school syndrome differentiation, explaining the six channels with eight principal syndrome differentiations; paid more attention to the combination of disease differentiation and syndrome differentiation, and emphasized the overall planning of prescription drugs with the treatment method;the four diagnostic methods of febrile disease such as consultation, tongue diagnosis, and pulse diagnosis were enriched, and explained the treatment of prostration syndrome with vivid cases; as well as increased the methods of life adjustment during illness, and summed up the main points of care.[Conclusion]The publication of “Revisited Common Treatise of Febrile Disease” has improved the theory of febrile disease of Shaoxing school, made the content more easy to understand and close to clinic. In particular, academic thoughts such as diagnosis methods and nursing care are quite distinctive in the genre of febrile disease, so that febrile disease of Shaoxing school, a school of traditional Chinese medicine with local characteristics of Zhejiang, can be carried forward in Zhejiang and even the whole country. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |