| 刘珍珠,胡建鹏,刘金涛,等.新安固本培元思想与江浙温补派形成期思想的区别与联系[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2022,46(3):295-299. |
| 新安固本培元思想与江浙温补派形成期思想的区别与联系 |
| The Difference and Connection Between “Consolidating Basis and Cultivating Primordial Qi” Theory in Xin‘an Medicine and “Warming and Tonic School” in Jiangsu and Zhejiang |
| DOI：10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2022.03.013 |
| 中文关键词: 固本培元 温补 元气 命门 太极 浙派中医 |
| 英文关键词: consolidating basis and cultivating primordial Qi warmly invigorating primordial Qi the gate of vitality Tai Chi Zhejiang school of Chinese medicine |
| 基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1704100、2018YFC1704105)；国家中医药管理局第四批全国中医优才资助项目(国中医药人教发[2017]24号) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1429 |
| 全文下载次数: 658 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的] 探索新安固本培元思想与江浙温补派思想的区别与联系。[方法] 采用文献分析法、比较研究法、历史研究法等方法，以汪机、薛己、徐春甫、孙一奎、赵献可、张介宾等医家及相关著作为主要研究对象，进行纵向梳理与横向分析。[结果] 以汪机、徐春甫、孙一奎等医家为主体的新安固本培元思想，与以薛己、赵献可、张介宾等医家为主体的江浙温补派，形成背景相同，思想主张相近，均强调元气的作用，重视脾肾二脏，阐发命门理论，且均偏重温补，反对滥用寒凉。但两者的思想核心并不相同，新安固本培元思想偏重于“阴阳一太极”，强调元气为生化之源与生命根本动力的作用，主张以后天补养先天，激发先天生生之机，继而反养后天，临证善用人参、黄芪等气血并调、脾肾同补，以培固元气；而江浙温补派偏重于“太极分阴阳”，更加重视太极划分以后阴阳二气对后天阴阳的充养，即强调命门水火的阴阳互根、互用之性，主张直补先天，进而以先天养后天，临证善用六味丸、八味丸等加减合方，以滋真阴真阳。[结论] 两派学术主张同中有异，医家之间相互影响，属于交叉互融的关系，可同属于易水学派的支脉，即广义的温补派范畴。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective] To explore the difference and connection between the thought of “consolidating basis and cultivating primordial Qi”， and the thought of “warming and tonic school in Jiangsu and Zhejiang”. [Methods] Through adopting the literature analysis method， the comparison research method， the historical research method and other related methods， this paper took WANG Ji， XUE Ji， XU Chunfu， SUN Yikui， ZHAO Xianke， ZHANG Jiebin and other doctors and related works as main research objects for longitudinal and horizontal analysis. [Results] “Consolidating basis and cultivating primordial Qi” theory was founded by WANG Ji， XU Chunfu， SUN Yikui and other doctors in Xin‘an， while “warming and tonic school in Jiangsu and Zhejiang” was established mainly by XUE Ji， ZHAO Xianke and ZHANG Jiebin. Both of them had the same background of formation and similar ideas， emphasized the function of primordial Qi and the spleen and kidney， and paid attention to the gate of vitality theory. In the treatment， they were more inclined to use warming tonic drugs， while against the abuse of cold and cool drugs. Among them， “consolidating basis and cultivating primordial Qi” theory emphasized “Yin and Yang belong to Tai Chi”， emphasized the role of primordial Qi as the source of biochemistry and the fundamental motive force of life. In treatment， it is advocated to use Panax ginseng， Astragalus membranaceus and other traditional Chinese herbs to regulate Qi and blood and tonifying the spleen and kidney to achieve the goal of strengthening Qi. While “warming and tonic school in Jiangsu and Zhejiang” emphasized “Tai Chi divides into Yin and Yang” and the mutual use of Yin and Yang， and paid more attention to the interaction between water and fire in the gate of vitality. Its clinical treatment method mostly used the Liuwei Pill， Bawei Pill and so on addition and subtraction prescription， in order to nourish Yin and Yang of the kidney. [Conclusion] There are some similarities and differences between the two schools of thought， and they also influenced each other in the formation of academic thoughts. They belong to the branch of Yishui school， the school of warm and tonification in a broad sense. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |