| 俞晓东,汪雨欣,黄文秀,等.新时代中医师岗位胜任力量表编制及信效度研究[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2023,47(11):1292-1299. |
| 新时代中医师岗位胜任力量表编制及信效度研究 |
| Study on Compilation and Reliability and Validity of Competency Scale for Traditional Chinese Practitioners in New Era |
| DOI：10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2023.11.009 |
| 中文关键词: 中医 中医师 胜任力 因子分析 信度 效度 新时代 量表 |
| 英文关键词: traditional Chinese medicine Chinese medicine practitioners competency factor analysis reliability validity new era scale |
| 基金项目:全国中医药教育发展中心项目全国中医药高等教育“十四五”规划2021年度教育科研课题(ZD-20-12) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 877 |
| 全文下载次数: 645 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的] 编制新时代背景下的中医师岗位胜任力量表，并对该量表在中医师群体中的信度和效度进行检验。[方法] 采用便利抽样法，于2022年7月至9月，选取浙江省杭州市3所三级甲等中医院的316名中医师进行问卷调查，进行信度和效度检验。于2022年10月至11月选取浙江省杭州市3所三级甲等中医院的333名中医师进行问卷调查，进行验证性因子分析。[结果] 中医师岗位胜任力量表包括6项维度(专业知识、专业技能、沟通能力、科研能力、态度及价值观、自我形象)，52项条目。量表的条目内容效度指数0.81～1.00，量表水平内容效度指数0.95。各维度克朗巴赫系数0.814～0.967，重测信度0.868～0.974、分半信度0.793～0.929。验证性因子分析提示，近似误差均方根(root-mean-square error of approximation，RSEMA)小于0.08、均方根残差(root-mean-square residual，RMR)小于0.05，增值拟合指数(incremental fit index，IFI)、塔克-刘易斯指数(Tucker-Lewis index，TLI)、比较拟合指数(comparative fit index，CFI)均大于0.900。[结论] 中医师岗位胜任力量表具备较好的信效度，可为中医师的考评、培养等方面提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective] To develop a job competency scale for Chinese medicine practitioners in the context of the new era and to test the reliability and validity of the scale in a group of Chinese medicine practitioners. [Methods] A questionnaire survey was conducted using convenience sampling method to examine the reliability and validity of the scale among 316 Chinese medicine practitioners selected from three tertiary level-A Chinese medicine hospitals in Hangzhou， Zhejiang Province from July to September 2022. A questionnaire survey was conducted from October to November 2022 with 333 Chinese medicine practitioners from three tertiary level A Chinese medicine hospitals in Hangzhou， Zhejiang Province， selected for validated factor analysis. [Results] The Chinese medicine practitioners job competency scale included 6 dimensions (professional knowledge， professional skills， communication ability， research ability， attitude and values and self-image) and 52 entries. The content validity index of the scale ranged from 0.81 to 1.00， and the scale-level content validity index of the scale level was 0.95. The item-level content validity index of each dimension ranged from 0.814 to 0.967， the retest reliability ranged from 0.868 to 0.974， and the split-half reliability ranged from 0.793 to 0.929. The confirmatory factor analysis of the root-mean-square error of approximation(RSEMA) was less than 0.08， the root-mean-square residual(RMR) was less than 0.05， and the incremental fit index(IFI)， the Tucker-Lewis index(TLI) and the comparative fit index(CFI) were all greater than 0.900. [Conclusion] The Chinese medicine practitioners job competency scale has good reliability and validity， and can be used as a reference for the evaluation and training of Chinese medicine practitioners. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |