| 任羽雯,周云仙,徐菁菡.医学教育增值评价的现状与路径分析——基于范围综述[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2025,49(2):227-234. |
| 医学教育增值评价的现状与路径分析——基于范围综述 |
| Current Situation and Path Analysis of Value-added Evaluation of Medical Education: A Scoping Review |
| DOI：10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2025.02.016 |
| 中文关键词: 增值评价 医学教育 高等教育 学生评价 教育效能管理 教育评价 范围综述 路径分析 |
| 英文关键词: value-added evaluation medical education higher education student evaluation educational effectiveness management educational evaluation scoping review path analysis |
| 基金项目:浙江中医药大学2022年度校级教育改革项目重大招标项目(791100G00884) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 70 |
| 全文下载次数: 79 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的] 全面探讨目前我国医学教育增值评价研究的现状、局限性与实施路径。[方法] 基于范围综述的方法，计算机检索中国知网、维普网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Complete、JSTOR共9个数据库的相关文献，检索时间为2001年1月1日至2024年5月20日，对文献进行筛选和资料提取，最后根据范围审查结果，剖析医学教育增值评价现状和局限性，并借鉴国际经验探讨具体实施路径。[结果] 共纳入文献31篇，结果显示增值评价研究在我国高等教育领域仍处于起步阶段。增值评价的目的为促进学生发展和教育效能管理，评价维度包括知识、能力、情感态度与价值观3个方面，评价模型包括自评增值模型、等值模型和回归模型3种类型，评价工具包括全国性调查问卷、其他量表或问卷、标准化测验3种类型。此外，共6篇文献为医学教育领域的增值评价研究。[结论] 未来医学教育增值评价可以从深化增值理念、兼顾全面增值、加强校企合作、建立电子档案等方面着手，促进医学教育评价的变革与发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective] To discuss the present situation， limitation and implementation path of the research on value-added evaluation of medical education in China. [Methods] This scoping review retrieved relevant literature from 9 databases， including CNKI， VIP， Wanfang Database， China Biomedical Literature Database， Web of Science， PubMed， Embase， CINAHL Complete and JSTOR from January 1，2001 to May 20，2024， and screened and extracted data from the retrieved literature. Based on the results of the scoping review， this study analyzed the current status and limitations of medical education value evaluation and draws on international experience to explore specific implementation paths. [Results] This scoping review included 31 literatures， and the results showed that value-added evaluation research was still in its infancy in the field of higher education in China. The evaluation aims to promote students’ development and educational effectiveness management. The evaluation dimensions include knowledge， ability， emotional attitude and values. The evaluation models include self-evaluation value-added model， equivalence model and regression model， and the evaluation tools include national questionnaires， other scales or questionnaires and standardized tests. In addition， a total of 6 articles are in the field of medical education. [Conclusion] In the future， the value-added evaluation of medical education can be carried out from the aspects of deepening the value-added concept， taking into account the overall value added， strengthening the cooperation between schools and enterprises， and establishing electronic archives， so as to promote the reform and development of medical education evaluation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |